Participation

Community

Readers can help decide what deserves investigation and can challenge the evidence we use. Participation can change what we investigate and what evidence we consider; voting never determines whether a claim is true.

Available now

Submit a Claim

Send the exact proposition, where you encountered it and any original source you can provide. We normalize broad narratives into testable claims before investigation.

Submit a claim →

Available now

Submit Evidence / Challenge a Source

Point us to a study, dataset, technical document, correction or counterargument we may have missed—or tell us why an existing source is being interpreted incorrectly.

Submit evidence →

Next community layer

Evidence Room

A structured discussion space around individual investigations and sources. The goal is auditable evidence challenges, not an unmoderated comment feed.

Planned after launch

Next community layer

Contributor Reputation

Reputation will reward useful sourcing, corrections and well-supported challenges—not agreement with a verdict and not raw popularity.

Planned after launch

What voting means

Attention can be crowdsourced. Truth cannot.

Future community voting may help prioritize which claims we investigate next. Evidence status remains an editorial conclusion derived from the evidence trail, never a popularity score.