Editorial constitution

Editorial standards

The rules below apply to every substantial investigation, regardless of topic, institution, ideology or speaker.

Evidence before authority

Institutional prestige is not proof. Experts and official bodies can provide data, methods and technical findings, but conclusions must remain traceable to evidence.

Primary sources first

When the underlying paper, dataset, report, standard, court document or technical record is available, we link to it rather than relying only on commentary about it.

Observation is not interpretation

We distinguish measurements and documented facts from inference, interpretation, uncertainty and editorial conclusion.

Strongest case, not easiest target

We address the strongest serious version of a claim and the strongest meaningful evidence offered in its support.

Calibrated language

Evidence statuses describe the record, not the intelligence or motives of people who believe a claim. We do not use certainty stronger than the evidence supports.

Visible corrections

Material mistakes are corrected openly. We record what changed, when it changed and whether the correction altered the conclusion.

Commercial independence

Advertising, sponsorships, memberships and other revenue sources must not determine which conclusion an investigation reaches. Material conflicts relevant to a claim must be disclosed.

AI assists; sources decide

AI may assist discovery, organization, comparison, drafting, coding and editing. AI output is never treated as evidence. Factual claims must be verified against underlying sources before publication.

Evidence language

Our conclusion states

Supported

Strong evidence supports the claim.

Mostly supported

The core claim is supported, with meaningful qualifications.

Misleading

Some underlying facts may be true, but the presentation creates a materially false impression.

Unsupported

Current evidence does not justify the claim.

Contradicted

Good evidence directly conflicts with the claim.

Inconclusive

The available evidence is insufficient or materially conflicting.

Unfalsifiable

The claim is framed so that no plausible observation could disconfirm it.