Reflexology: an update of a systematic review of randomised clinical trials
This page documents how this source is reused across Claim by Claim. A source can support, challenge, qualify or contextualize different claims; appearing here does not imply endorsement of every linked proposition.
Evidence roles describe what this source helps establish inside each Investigation. They are local to that use, not permanent labels attached to the publication itself.
A systematic review of 23 randomized trials found mixed results and frequent poor methodology; the authors concluded that the best clinical evidence did not convincingly demonstrate reflexology as an effective treatment for any medical condition.