Start typing to search across the full knowledge system.
Canonical Source · peer reviewed study
This page documents how this source is reused across Claim by Claim. A source can support, challenge, qualify or contextualize different claims; appearing here does not imply endorsement of every linked proposition.
Evidence context
Evidence roles describe what this source helps establish inside each Investigation. They are local to that use, not permanent labels attached to the publication itself.
Investigation
An independent French prospective cohort of 102,865 adults found an adjusted cancer association for higher aspartame consumers (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03–1.28). As an observational result it supports a genuine signal but not a causal absolute risk at ordinary exposure.
Subject families