This page documents how this source is reused across Claim by Claim. A source can support, challenge, qualify or contextualize different claims; appearing here does not imply endorsement of every linked proposition.
Evidence roles describe what this source helps establish inside each Investigation. They are local to that use, not permanent labels attached to the publication itself.
The National Academies found important theoretical and methodological limitations, warned that physiological responses are not specific to deception, and judged real-world and screening accuracy much less certain than simple accuracy claims imply.
The National Academies review recognized countermeasures as a serious vulnerability and concluded that laboratory evidence shows they can alter polygraph outcomes, while noting uncertainty about their prevalence and effectiveness in real field use.