Canonical Source · peer reviewed study

Does radiofrequency radiation impact sleep? A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study

This page documents how this source is reused across Claim by Claim. A source can support, challenge, qualify or contextualize different claims; appearing here does not imply endorsement of every linked proposition.

Evidence context

How this source is used

Evidence roles describe what this source helps establish inside each Investigation. They are local to that use, not permanent labels attached to the publication itself.

Investigation

Does sleeping near a Wi-Fi router prevent normal biological repair?

Qualifies

In a double-blind randomized 12-adult crossover pilot, a 2.45 GHz baby monitor over seven nights worsened self-rated sleep (n=11 PIRS-20) and altered selected EEG bands versus sham, while HRV and actigraphy effects were null; no cellular biological repair endpoints tested.

Subject families

Skin Empiric
Skin