Start typing to search across the full knowledge system.
Canonical Source · peer reviewed study
This page documents how this source is reused across Claim by Claim. A source can support, challenge, qualify or contextualize different claims; appearing here does not imply endorsement of every linked proposition.
Evidence context
Evidence roles describe what this source helps establish inside each Investigation. They are local to that use, not permanent labels attached to the publication itself.
Investigation
A 2025 comparison of 42 grounded and 42 control spinal-surgery patients reported postoperative pain and CRP differences. Short follow-up, baseline imbalance and inconsistent CRP units limit any inference about established treatment of chronic disease.
Subject families