Canonical Source · consensus statement

Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects

This page documents how this source is reused across Claim by Claim. A source can support, challenge, qualify or contextualize different claims; appearing here does not imply endorsement of every linked proposition.

Evidence context

How this source is used

Evidence roles describe what this source helps establish inside each Investigation. They are local to that use, not permanent labels attached to the publication itself.

Investigation

Are genetically modified foods inherently dangerous to human health?

Challenges

The National Academies found no substantiated evidence that currently commercialized genetically engineered foods are less safe for human health than conventionally bred counterparts as a class.

Qualifies

The same evidence base supports evaluating individual engineered traits and products for composition, allergenicity and other specific endpoints rather than assuming either universal safety or universal danger.

Subject families

Skin Empiric
Skin