Canonical Source · meta analysis

Re-challenge Studies in Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This page documents how this source is reused across Claim by Claim. A source can support, challenge, qualify or contextualize different claims; appearing here does not imply endorsement of every linked proposition.

Evidence context

How this source is used

Evidence roles describe what this source helps establish inside each Investigation. They are local to that use, not permanent labels attached to the publication itself.

Investigation

Is gluten unhealthy for everyone?

Qualifies

Blinded rechallenge evidence indicates that a subset of self-identified non-celiac patients can reproducibly respond, while many do not react specifically to gluten.

Subject families

Skin Empiric
Skin